[CCing the regression list, as it should be in the loop for regressions: https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/reporting-regressions.html] [TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form. See link in footer if these mails annoy you.] On 01.06.23 13:14, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 30/03/2023 23:47, Paul E. McKenney wrote: >> This commit moves the ->srcu_gp_seq, ->srcu_gp_seq_needed, >> ->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, ->srcu_gp_start, and ->srcu_last_gp_end fields >> from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce >> the size of the former in order to improve cache locality. >> >> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> >> Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> >> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > I have noticed a suspend regression on some of our Tegra boards recently > with v6.4-rc and interestingly bisect is pointing to this commit. I was > unable revert this on top of the latest mainline but if I checkout this > commit suspend fails and if I checkout the previous commit is passes. Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression tracking bot: #regzbot ^introduced 95433f726301 #regzbot title rcu: "spinlock bad magic" BUG when the SRCU notifier was ever used #regzbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230526073539.339203-1-wenst@xxxxxxxxxxxx/ #regzbot fix: notifier: Initialize new struct srcu_usage field #regzbot ignore-activity Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.
