On 4/8/23 19:53, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes > many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by > returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored > and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a > quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this > quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns > void. > > Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove > callback to the void returning variant. > > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> b4 seems didn't take my tag on 00/49, here it is again: Acked-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@xxxxxxxxxx>
