On 6 Mar 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski stated: > On 06/03/2023 18:13, Nick Alcock wrote: >> On 6 Mar 2023, Krzysztof Kozlowski told this: >> >>> On 06/03/2023 15:30, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 24/02/2023 16:07, Nick Alcock wrote: >>>>> Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without >>>>> Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations >>>>> are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro >>>>> in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing >>>>> object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe >>>>> might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message. >>>>> >>>>> So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as >>>>> modules. >>>> >>>> Applied as well. Squashed with next one. Same subject messes with b4, so >>>> prefix should be corrected if these were to stay as separate patches. >>> >>> And all dropped. Run checkpatch before sending patches. >> >> So... which of the 27 patches n this series is being dropped? It would >> also be nice to know what the checkpatch problems were, because all I >> can see from checkpatch is one error per patch, an apparent false > > The ones I responded that I applied - so the memory controller ones. OK, resent those three (now two), checkpatch-clean and fused identical subjects together. (Not adjusted non-memory-controller patch commit logs, to avoid causing disruption with those that are already flowing into the tree.) Hope this is better :) -- NULL && (void)