Re: [PATCH v4 17/19] thermal/tegra: Do not enable the thermal zone, it is already enabled

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/03/2023 15:29, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 12:22:36PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
The code enables the thermal zone after setting it up. But the thermal
zone is already enabled by thermal_of_zone_register() function.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c | 8 +-------
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
index 3506c3f3c474..e38902abf207 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/tegra30-tsensor.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int tegra_tsensor_enable_hw_channel(const struct tegra_tsensor *ts,
  {
  	const struct tegra_tsensor_channel *tsc = &ts->ch[id];
  	struct thermal_zone_device *tzd = tsc->tzd;
-	int err, hot_trip = 0, crit_trip = 0;
+	int hot_trip = 0, crit_trip = 0;
  	u32 val;
if (!tzd) {
@@ -401,12 +401,6 @@ static int tegra_tsensor_enable_hw_channel(const struct tegra_tsensor *ts,
  	val |= FIELD_PREP(TSENSOR_SENSOR0_CONFIG0_INTR_THERMAL_RST_EN, 1);
  	writel_relaxed(val, tsc->regs + TSENSOR_SENSOR0_CONFIG0);
- err = thermal_zone_device_enable(tzd);
-	if (err) {
-		dev_err(ts->dev, "ch%u: failed to enable zone: %d\n", id, err);
-		return err;
-	}
-
  	return 0;
  }

This function is called in tegra_tsensor_resume() and balances out the
tegra_tsensor_hw_channel() calls from tegra_tsensor_suspend(). If we
remove the call from here, we'll likely end up with the zones disabled
after a resume.

This ends up calling thermal_zone_device_set_mode(), which is a no-op,
basically, if the mode is unchanged, so this seems harmless.

If you need this to change anyway, I suppose we could move the calls to
thermal_zone_device_enable() and move them into suspend/resume instead.
That's a bit tricky to undo in the error recovery paths, but should be
doable.

No it is fine, I will just drop this patch from the series.


--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux