On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 12:39:13PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Lorenzo, > > On 18/10/2022 17:43, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 07:21:54AM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > > > On 13/09/2022 11:12, Vidya Sagar wrote: > > > > Some of the platforms (like Tegra194 and Tegra234) have open slots and > > > > not having an endpoint connected to the slot is not an error. > > > > So, changing the macro from dev_err to dev_info to log the event. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > > > index 650a7f22f9d0..25154555aa7a 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c > > > > @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ int dw_pcie_wait_for_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) > > > > } > > > > if (retries >= LINK_WAIT_MAX_RETRIES) { > > > > - dev_err(pci->dev, "Phy link never came up\n"); > > > > + dev_info(pci->dev, "Phy link never came up\n"); > > > > return -ETIMEDOUT; > > > > } > > > > > > > > > Are you OK to take this change? > > > > When this came up, Lorenzo was in the middle of a big move and I was > > covering for him while he was unavailable. But he's back, and I'm > > sure he will resolve this soon. > > > > Personally I'm OK either way. > > > > Bjorn > > > Can we come to a conclusion on this? > > We have tests that fail when errors/warning messages are reported. We can > choose to ignore these errors, but given that this is not an error in this > case, we were thinking it is better to make it informational. I understood. We are at v6.1-rc2, this patch is not a fix, we will handle it for the v6.2 merge window. Thanks, Lorenzo