> On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 08:27:27PM +0530, Akhil R wrote: > > Document the compatible string used by GPCDMA controller for Tegra234. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra186-gpc-dma.yaml | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra186-gpc-dma.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra186-gpc-dma.yaml > > index 9dd1476d1849..81f3badbc8ec 100644 > > --- > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra186-gpc-dma.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/nvidia,tegra186-gpc-dma.ya > > +++ ml > > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ properties: > > oneOf: > > - const: nvidia,tegra186-gpcdma > > - items: > > + - const: nvidia,tegra234-gpcdma > > - const: nvidia,tegra194-gpcdma > > - const: nvidia,tegra186-gpcdma > > I don't think this works because it will now fail to validate Tegra194 device trees. > You'll need to create a separate set of items for Tegra234. If I update it as below, would it work? - items: - const: nvidia,tegra234-gpcdma - const: nvidia,tegra186-gpcdma - items: - const: nvidia,tegra194-gpcdma - const: nvidia,tegra186-gpcdma Regards, Akhil -- nvpublic
