Hi Pratyush, Uwe, p.yadav@xxxxxx wrote on Tue, 7 Jun 2022 15:02:36 +0530: > Hi Miquel, > > On 06/06/22 03:18PM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > > > u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 3 Jun 2022 23:07:44 +0200: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > this series prepares to make platform remove callbacks return void. > > > Therefor first update them to always return 0. The rationale is that the > > > Linux device model doesn't handle failures on remove and if a remove > > > callback returns an error, it just emits a quite generic error message > > > and still removes the device. > > > > Tudor, Pratyush, Richard, Vignesh, > > > > The series looks good to me (besides the atmel patch), I think it's > > best to take it directly through mtd/next instead of going through all > > the different internal branches, please let me know if you disagree > > with the idea. > > Patch 2 does not look good to me. It modifies the aspeed-smc driver in > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/controllers/ but the driver has been moved to > drivers/spi/ in Mark's next branch [0]. The patch would likely conflict > with that. > > [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit?id=9c63b846e6df43e5b3d31263f7db545f32deeda3 Right, I believe Uwe is sending per-subsystems series so now that he is aware we can safely drop patch 2. Thanks, Miquèl
