Hi Rob,
I have just sent out the patch to fix this.
Best Regards,
Dipen Patel
On 5/23/22 9:05 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 7:35 PM Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 May 2022 10:50:11 -0700, Dipen Patel wrote:
>>> Renamed hte dt binding directory to timestamp according review comment.
>>> Addressed minor comment about having HTE acronym first in the common dt
>>> binding document.
>>>
>>> The change reflects above renaming in MAINTAINERS files too.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> This patch is on top of old series (Intro to Hardware timestamping
>>> engine V6) present in linux-next tentatively in preparation for
>>> merge.
>>>
>>> .../{hte => timestamp}/hardware-timestamps-common.yaml | 6 +++---
>>> .../bindings/{hte => timestamp}/hte-consumer.yaml | 0
>>> .../bindings/{hte => timestamp}/nvidia,tegra194-hte.yaml | 0
>>> MAINTAINERS | 2 +-
>>> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{hte => timestamp}/hardware-timestamps-common.yaml (71%)
>>> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{hte => timestamp}/hte-consumer.yaml (100%)
>>> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{hte => timestamp}/nvidia,tegra194-hte.yaml (100%)
>>>
>> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> I take that back:
>
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timestamp/hte-consumer.yaml: $id:
> relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename
> expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/timestamp/hte-consumer.yaml#
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timestamp/nvidia,tegra194-hte.yaml:
> $id: relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename
> expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/timestamp/nvidia,tegra194-hte.yaml#
> ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timestamp/hardware-timestamps-common.yaml:
> $id: relative path/filename doesn't match actual path or filename
> expected: http://devicetree.org/schemas/timestamp/hardware-timestamps-common.yaml#
>
>
> I was wondering why a new common binding was already in next without a
> Reviewed-by, but I let that slide. Now I regret doing that.
>
> Rob
