Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: tegra: Add Tegra234 GPCDMA device tree node

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 13/05/2022 09:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 12/05/2022 11:00, Akhil R wrote:
Add device tree nodes for Tegra234 GPCDMA

Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
index cb3af539e477..860c3cc68cea 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
@@ -21,6 +21,49 @@
ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x40000000>; + gpcdma: dma-controller@2600000 {
+			compatible = "nvidia,tegra194-gpcdma",
+				      "nvidia,tegra186-gpcdma";
+			reg = <0x2600000 0x210000>;
+			resets = <&bpmp TEGRA234_RESET_GPCDMA>;
+			reset-names = "gpcdma";
+			interrupts = <GIC_SPI 76 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 78 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 79 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 80 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 81 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 82 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 87 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 88 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 89 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 90 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 92 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 93 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 94 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 95 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 96 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 98 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 99 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 100 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 101 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 102 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 103 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 104 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 105 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
+				     <GIC_SPI 106 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
+			#dma-cells = <1>;
+			iommus = <&smmu_niso0 TEGRA234_SID_GPCDMA>;
+			dma-coherent;
+			status = "okay";

okay is by default for new nodes.

Just so I know, is it recommended then to drop the status in this case or is it OK to leave as is?

Jon

--
nvpublic



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux