On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:01:03 +0000, cgel.zte@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate > for simplifing code > > Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next Thanks! [1/1] spi: spi-tegra20-sflash: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync commit: 2b8070840e6f48b5406ebe1630a0335843109799 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark
