On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 06:24:21PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>
>
> > > Adding cclpex node to represent Tegra234 cpufreq.
> > > Tegra234 uses some of the CRAB (Control Register Access Bus)
> > > registers for cpu frequency requests. These registers are
> > > memory mapped to CCPLEX_MMCRAB_ARM region. In this node, mapping
> > > the range of MMCRAB registers required only for cpu frequency info.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
> > > index aaace605bdaa..610207f3f967 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/nvidia/tegra234.dtsi
> > > @@ -1258,6 +1258,13 @@
> > > };
> > > };
> > > + ccplex@e000000 {
> > > + compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-ccplex-cluster";
> > > + reg = <0x0 0x0e000000 0x0 0x5ffff>;
> > > + nvidia,bpmp = <&bpmp>;
> > > + status = "okay";
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > sram@40000000 {
> > > compatible = "nvidia,tegra234-sysram", "mmio-sram";
> > > reg = <0x0 0x40000000 0x0 0x80000>;
> >
> >
> > We need to add this compatible string to a DT binding doc somewhere.
> It seems the binding doc was previously posted in [1] for T186 SoC.
> Same will be applicable for T234 SoC also. Only compatible string need to be
> added.
> Should I sent a separate patch after converting it to yaml format and add
> compatible string (or) send as part of v2.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/3/324
Yeah, it's probably best to pick up Mikko's patch, convert the bindings
to YAML and then make the addition of the Tegra234 compatible string a
separate patch on top of that. Alternatively you may want to add the
compatible string while doing the conversion since it's just a one-line
change.
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
