17.02.2022 22:16, Thierry Reding пишет: > +int drm_tegra_bo_get_name(struct drm_tegra_bo *bo, uint32_t *name); > +int drm_tegra_bo_open(struct drm_tegra *drm, uint32_t name, uint32_t flags, > + struct drm_tegra_bo **bop); drm_tegra_bo_open() isn't a very good name for a function. How will you name dmabuf and handle variants? In grate-drive we're using these names: drm_tegra_bo_from_name drm_tegra_bo_from_dmabuf drm_tegra_bo_from_handle I suggest to use more meaningful function names before will be too late, especially given that this is the upstream libdrm.
