> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 03:49:09AM +0000, Akhil R wrote:
> > > Hi Akhil,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 09:09:34PM +0530, Akhil R wrote:
> > > > Adding GPC DMA controller driver for Tegra. The driver supports dma
> > > > transfers between memory to memory, IO peripheral to memory and
> memory
> > > > to IO peripheral.
> > > >
> > > > Co-developed-by: Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Co-developed-by: Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Akhil R <akhilrajeev@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 11 +
> > > > drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c | 1507
> > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > 3 files changed, 1519 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> > > > +static const struct __maybe_unused dev_pm_ops
> tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops =
> > > > +{
> > >
> > > The __maybe_unused cannot split the type ("struct dev_pm_ops") otherwise
> it
> > > causes a clang warning:
> > >
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/202202221207.lQ53BwKp-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> > >
> > > static const struct dev_pm_ops tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops __maybe_unused =
> {
> > >
> > > would look a litle better I think. However, is this attribute even needed? The
> > > variable is unconditionally used below, so there should be no warning about
> it
> > > being unused?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Nathan
> > >
> > > > + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(tegra_dma_pm_suspend,
> > > > +tegra_dma_pm_resume) };
> > > > +
> > > > +static struct platform_driver tegra_dma_driver = {
> > > > + .driver = {
> > > > + .name = "tegra-gpcdma",
> > > > + .pm = &tegra_dma_dev_pm_ops,
> > > > + .of_match_table = tegra_dma_of_match,
> > > > + },
> > > > + .probe = tegra_dma_probe,
> > > > + .remove = tegra_dma_remove,
> > > > +};
> > > > +
> > > > +module_platform_driver(tegra_dma_driver);
> > > > +
> > > > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("NVIDIA Tegra GPC DMA Controller driver");
> > > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Pavan Kunapuli <pkunapuli@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> > > > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Rajesh Gumasta <rgumasta@xxxxxxxxxx>");
> > > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > > > --
> > > > 2.17.1
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > Hi Nathan,
> >
> > Thanks. Will update the same.
> >
> > I am getting notification for the below warning also.
> >
> > >> drivers/dma/tegra186-gpc-dma.c:898:53: warning: shift count >= width of
> type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > FIELD_PREP(TEGRA_GPCDMA_HIGH_ADDR_DST_PTR, (dest >>
> 32));
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/202202230559.bLOEMEUh-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > I suppose, this is because it is compiled against a different ARCH other than
> arm64.
> > For arm64, the dma_addr_t is 64 bytes, and this warning does not occur.
> > Could this be ignored for now? If not, could you suggest a fix, if possible?
>
> I am not really familiar with the DMA API and dma_addr_t so I am not
> sure about a proper fix.
>
> You could cast dest to u64 to guarantee it is a type that can be shifted
> by 32 but that might not be right for CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n. If the
> driver is not expected to run without CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT, then
> this is probably fine.
>
> You could mark this driver 'depends on PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT' if it cannot
> run with CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA=y + CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=n but I do
> not
> see any other drivers that do that, which might mean that is not a
> proper fix.
>
> Please do not ignore the warning, as it will show up with ARCH=arm
> allmodconfig, which has -Werror enabled.
I see some drivers using 'depends on ARM64'. I guess probably we could
use that to avoid this warning. The driver is only supported for arm64 Tegra
systems as of now.
Thanks,
Akhil
