On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 08:39:24AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 29/10/2021 21:14, wander@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Note: I am using a small test app + driver located at [0] for the
> > problem description. serco is a driver whose write function dispatches
> > to the serial controller. sertest is a user-mode app that writes n bytes
> > to the serial console using the serco driver.
> >
> > While investigating a bug in the RHEL kernel, I noticed that the serial
> > console throughput is way below the configured speed of 115200 bps in
> > a HP Proliant DL380 Gen9. I was expecting something above 10KB/s, but
> > I got 2.5KB/s.
> >
> > $ time ./sertest -n 2500 /tmp/serco
> >
> > real 0m0.997s
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m0.997s
> >
> > With the help of the function tracer, I then noticed the serial
> > controller was taking around 410us seconds to dispatch one single byte:
> >
> > $ trace-cmd record -p function_graph -g serial8250_console_write \
> > ./sertest -n 1 /tmp/serco
> >
> > $ trace-cmd report
> >
> > | serial8250_console_write() {
> > 0.384 us | _raw_spin_lock_irqsave();
> > 1.836 us | io_serial_in();
> > 1.667 us | io_serial_out();
> > | uart_console_write() {
> > | serial8250_console_putchar() {
> > | wait_for_xmitr() {
> > 1.870 us | io_serial_in();
> > 2.238 us | }
> > 1.737 us | io_serial_out();
> > 4.318 us | }
> > 4.675 us | }
> > | wait_for_xmitr() {
> > 1.635 us | io_serial_in();
> > | __const_udelay() {
> > 1.125 us | delay_tsc();
> > 1.429 us | }
> > ...
> > ...
> > ...
> > 1.683 us | io_serial_in();
> > | __const_udelay() {
> > 1.248 us | delay_tsc();
> > 1.486 us | }
> > 1.671 us | io_serial_in();
> > 411.342 us | }
> >
> > In another machine, I measured a throughput of 11.5KB/s, with the serial
> > controller taking between 80-90us to send each byte. That matches the
> > expected throughput for a configuration of 115200 bps.
> >
> > This patch changes the serial8250_console_write to use the 16550 fifo
> > if available. In my benchmarks I got around 25% improvement in the slow
> > machine, and no performance penalty in the fast machine.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wander Lairson Costa <wander@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> On the current mainline and -next branches, I have noticed that the
> serial output on many of our Tegra boards is corrupted and so
> parsing the serial output is failing.
>
> Before this change the serial console would appear as follows ...
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0000000000 [0x411fd071]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.16.0-rc6-00091-gadbfddc757ae (jonathanh@jonathanh-vm-01) (aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Linaro GCC 6.4-2017.08) 6.4.1 20170707, GNU ld (Linaro_Binutils-2017.08) 2.27.0.20161019) #15 SMP PREEMPT Tue Jan 25 00:15:25 PST 2022
> [ 0.000000] Machine model: NVIDIA Jetson TX1 Developer Kit
>
> And now I see ...
>
> [ 0.000000] Booting Linux on physicalfd071]
> [ 0.000000] Linux version 5.16.0-rc6-athanh@j-linux-g017.08) Linaro_B20161019n 25 00:[ 0.000000] Machine model: NVIDIA Jet[ 0.000000] efi: UEFI not found.
> [ 0.000000] NUMA: No NUMA configurati[ 0.000000] NUMA: Faking a node at [m00000001[ 0.000000] NUMA: NODE_DATA [mem 0x17[ 0.000000] Zone ranges:
>
> Bisecting is pointing to this commit. Let me know if there are any
> tests I can run. Otherwise we may need to disable this at least
> for Tegra.
Ick. Does this uart have any other quirks assigned to it that are
somehow not getting assigned here?
thanks,
greg k-h
