On 21/01/2022 13:31, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> ...
>> @@ -529,12 +536,44 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra30_mc_handle_irq(int irq, void *data)
>> u8 id, type;
>> u32 value;
>>
>> - value = mc_readl(mc, MC_ERR_STATUS);
>> + switch (bit) {
>
> Again, I see that the code wasn't tested :/ Shouldn't be too difficult
> to create memory-read errors to check that at least basics work
> properly. Please always test your changes next time.
>
> So it must be "switch(BIT(bit))" here, please write it like this:
>
> u32 intmask = BIT(bit);
> ...
> switch(intmask) {
>
Also, please build your changes with W=1... It's the second try of
sending un-tested and not-working code. This time also with a compiler
warning. This looks very bad :(
For big companies with a lot of engineers, like nVidia, it is useful if
some internal review happens. It is a nice way to offload community
reviewers which are - like maintainers - a scarce resource. Doing
internal review is not a requirement, but helps to find such mistakes
earlier, before using the community. It is simply nice to us.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
