13.12.2021 19:11, Thierry Reding пишет:
> On Fri, Dec 10, 2021 at 09:08:43PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 10.12.2021 18:05, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:24:26PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> 09.12.2021 20:33, Thierry Reding пишет:
>>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>
>>>>> The Ouya board specifies the #reset-cells property for the GPIO
>>>>> controller. Since the GPIO controller doesn't provide reset controls
>>>>> this is not needed, so they can be dropped.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-ouya.dts | 1 -
>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-ouya.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-ouya.dts
>>>>> index 4259871b76c9..fd64aadc472a 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-ouya.dts
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-ouya.dts
>>>>> @@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ hdmi@54280000 {
>>>>>
>>>>> gpio: gpio@6000d000 {
>>>>> gpio-ranges = <&pinmux 0 0 248>;
>>>>> - #reset-cells = <1>;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> pinmux@70000868 {
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can we uncomment the gpio-ranges in tegra.dtsi? I reviewed and tested it
>>>> almost 3 years ago [1].
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/20180726154025.13173-2-stefan@xxxxxxxx/
>>>
>>> Does it still work today?
>>
>> It works. That patch still applies as-is.
>
> Alright, I'll pull that in then.
No-no-no, please rebase your patches on top of latest mine [1]. Please
do it that way, this will be better for everyone. I already took care of
all the conflicts between the patches and added the new ones, all you
need to do is to *rebase your* patches.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/list/?series=276354
You're again not looking at the incoming emails, are you receiving them
at all? This situation is very strange to me. I'll continue to keep eye
on what you're doing to make sure that everything will be merged properly.
