On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:58:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> 09.12.2021 22:54, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 10:44:25PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >>
> >>
> >> 09.12.2021 22:24, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:49:09PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 09.12.2021 10:38, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> >>>>> +static unsigned long pd_pt_index_iova(unsigned int pd_index, unsigned int pt_index)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + return (pd_index & (SMMU_NUM_PDE - 1)) << SMMU_PDE_SHIFT |
> >>>>> + (pt_index & (SMMU_NUM_PTE - 1)) << SMMU_PTE_SHIFT;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd change the return type to u32 here, for consistency.
> >>>
> >>> The whole file defines iova using "unsigned long", which I see
> >>> as the consistency... If we change it to u32, it'd be probably
> >>> necessary to change all iova types to u32 too... So I'd rather
> >>> keep it "unsigned long" here. If you see a big necessity to do
> >>> that, an additional patch would be nicer IMHO.
> >>>
> >>
> >> In general IOVA is "unsigned long", of course. But in case of Tegra
> >> SMMU, we know that is always u32.
> >>
> >> Alright, I see now that there are other places in the driver code that
> >> use "unsigned long", so need to change it in this patch.
> >
> > I think we should do that in a separate patch that changes the iova
> > type in the entire tegra-smmu file. I can add one in this series, if
> > this makes you happy...
> >
>
> Please keep it "unsigned long", no need for extra patches.
Oh, I guess that "so need to change it in this patch" should be
"so (no) need to change it in this patch" then?
