09.12.2021 18:33, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 5:30 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 09.12.2021 18:05, Akhil R пишет:
>>> +static int tegra_i2c_setup_smbalert(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct tegra_i2c_smbalert *smbalert = &i2c_dev->smbalert;
>>> + struct gpio_desc *alert_gpiod;
>>> + struct i2c_client *ara;
>>> +
>>> + alert_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get(i2c_dev->dev, "smbalert", GPIOD_IN);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(alert_gpiod))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(alert_gpiod);
>>> +
>>> + smbalert->alert_data.irq = gpiod_to_irq(alert_gpiod);
>>> + if (smbalert->alert_data.irq <= 0)
>>> + return smbalert->alert_data.irq;
>>
>> 0 is the error condition.
>
> I'm not sure what you implied here. gpiod_to_irq() returns 0 if and
> only if it goes to the architectures where it might be possible to
> have valid vIRQ 0, but this is not the case (at least I never heard of
> a such) for GPIO controllers on such platforms. So, looking at the
> above code I may tell that the '=' part is redundant.
>
Yes, removal of the '=' should be enough here.
