On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:03:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 04:07:45PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Add support for the NVIDIA Denver and Carmel PMUs using the generic
> > PMUv3 event map for now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > index b4044469527e..8c8cf369c450 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> > @@ -1247,6 +1247,18 @@ static int armv8_vulcan_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > armv8_vulcan_map_event);
> > }
> >
> > +static int armv8_denver_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > +{
> > + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_denver",
> > + armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int armv8_carmel_pmu_init(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
> > +{
> > + return armv8_pmu_init_nogroups(cpu_pmu, "armv8_nvidia_carmel",
> > + armv8_pmuv3_map_event);
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> > {.compatible = "arm,armv8-pmuv3", .data = armv8_pmuv3_init},
> > {.compatible = "arm,cortex-a34-pmu", .data = armv8_a34_pmu_init},
> > @@ -1265,6 +1277,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id armv8_pmu_of_device_ids[] = {
> > {.compatible = "arm,neoverse-n1-pmu", .data = armv8_n1_pmu_init},
> > {.compatible = "cavium,thunder-pmu", .data = armv8_thunder_pmu_init},
> > {.compatible = "brcm,vulcan-pmu", .data = armv8_vulcan_pmu_init},
> > + {.compatible = "nvidia,denver-pmu", .data = armv8_denver_pmu_init},
> > + {.compatible = "nvidia,carmel-pmu", .data = armv8_carmel_pmu_init},
>
> Super trivial nit, but could we please organise this alphabetically (i.e. with carmel first?)
>
> With that:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx>
>
> I see now that we messed up the order of "cavium,thunder-pmu" and
> "brcm,vulcan-pmu", but otherwise this is ordered, and it's be nice to keep it
> that way. I can fix the order of those two in a separate patch.
I ordered this chronologically (Denver for Tegra186 and Carmel for
Tegra194), which seemed a bit more natural, but I can reorder this
alphabetically if you prefer.
Would Will be the right person to pick this up or should I take it
through the Tegra tree and then ARM SoC?
Thanks,
Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
