28.11.2021 04:51, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2021 at 05:23:18PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> From: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add device-tree for ASUS Transformer Prime TF201, which is NVIDIA
>> Tegra30-based tablet device.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Ion Agorria <ion@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Ion Agorria <ion@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Co-developed-by: Maxim Schwalm <maxim.schwalm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxim Schwalm <maxim.schwalm@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Svyatoslav Ryhel <clamor95@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> .../boot/dts/tegra30-asus-lvds-display.dtsi | 46 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-tf201.dts | 623 ++++++
>> .../dts/tegra30-asus-transformer-common.dtsi | 1741 +++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 2411 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-lvds-display.dtsi
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-tf201.dts
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-asus-transformer-common.dtsi
>
> I think the common.dtsi is combined from all the DT authors, so they all
> should be mentioned in the co-developed/signed-off lines. (Or maybe just
> split the common part out if you want to be more specific in assigning
> credits?)
I'll factor out the common part into separate patch and will make you
the author of that patch since it really was derived from yours original
TF300T DT. I actually wanted to do that previously, it's good that you
reminded about it.
>> + i2c@7000c400 {
>> + /* Atmel MXT768E touchscreen */
>> + touchscreen@4d {
> [...]
>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
>> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(H, 4) IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> [...]
>
> Nit: This could use 'interrupts-extended' as it's more readable, I think.
> (There are similar cases in other DTs.)
I don't have objections, although the classic variant is also good to me.
I don't think that it makes sense to change only the Transformer DTs to
use 'interrupts-extended'. I'd suggest to create a followup patches that
will cleanup and improve all Tegra device-trees together, making them
all more uniform and nicer to look.
>> + uartb: serial@70006040 {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-hsuart";
> [...]
>
> I wonder why isn't this in the tegra30.dtsi? The DT shouldn't select a
> driver - it should only describe the hardware.
The "nvidia,tegra30-hsuart" implies that UART port is capable of
performing the high speed transfers, which should be board dependent.
Meanwhile "nvidia,tegra30-uart" should work for all hardware variants.
That's how I understand it.
The comment in the Tegra dtsi really shouldn't refer to the drivers.
Changing that comment should be material for a separate patch. It could
become a part of the DT cleanup patches together with the
'interrupts-extended' changes.
