Re: [PATCH v13 11/35] drm/tegra: dc: Support OPP and SoC core voltage scaling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 27 Sept 2021 at 00:42, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add OPP and SoC core voltage scaling support to the display controller
> driver. This is required for enabling system-wide DVFS on pre-Tegra186
> SoCs.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx> # Ouya T30
> Tested-by: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@xxxxxxxxx> # PAZ00 T20
> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@xxxxxxxxx> # PAZ00 T20 and TK1 T124
> Tested-by: Matt Merhar <mattmerhar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # Ouya T30
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
> index a29d64f87563..d4047a14e2b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/dc.c
> @@ -11,9 +11,12 @@
>  #include <linux/interconnect.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_domain.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_opp.h>
>  #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>  #include <linux/reset.h>
>
> +#include <soc/tegra/common.h>
>  #include <soc/tegra/pmc.h>
>
>  #include <drm/drm_atomic.h>
> @@ -1762,6 +1765,47 @@ int tegra_dc_state_setup_clock(struct tegra_dc *dc,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static void tegra_dc_update_voltage_state(struct tegra_dc *dc,
> +                                         struct tegra_dc_state *state)
> +{
> +       unsigned long rate, pstate;
> +       struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       if (!dc->has_opp_table)
> +               return;
> +
> +       /* calculate actual pixel clock rate which depends on internal divider */
> +       rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(clk_get_rate(dc->clk) * 2, state->div + 2);
> +
> +       /* find suitable OPP for the rate */
> +       opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(dc->dev, &rate);
> +
> +       if (opp == ERR_PTR(-ERANGE))
> +               opp = dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(dc->dev, &rate);
> +
> +       if (IS_ERR(opp)) {
> +               dev_err(dc->dev, "failed to find OPP for %luHz: %pe\n",
> +                       rate, opp);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       pstate = dev_pm_opp_get_required_pstate(opp, 0);
> +       dev_pm_opp_put(opp);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The minimum core voltage depends on the pixel clock rate (which
> +        * depends on internal clock divider of the CRTC) and not on the
> +        * rate of the display controller clock. This is why we're not using
> +        * dev_pm_opp_set_rate() API and instead controlling the power domain
> +        * directly.
> +        */
> +       err = dev_pm_genpd_set_performance_state(dc->dev, pstate);
> +       if (err)
> +               dev_err(dc->dev, "failed to set power domain state to %lu: %d\n",
> +                       pstate, err);

Yeah, the above code looks very similar to the code I pointed to in
patch6. Perhaps we need to discuss with Viresh, whether it makes sense
to fold in a patch adding an opp helper function after all, to avoid
the open coding.

Viresh?

[...]

Kind regards
Uffe



[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux