On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:24:28AM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > On 8/18/21 12:20 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 01:50:28PM +0300, Mikko Perttunen wrote: > > > Add YAML device tree bindings for NVDEC, now in a more appropriate > > > place compared to the old textual Host1x bindings. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > v3: > > > * Drop host1x bindings > > > * Change read2 to read-1 in interconnect names > > > v2: > > > * Fix issues pointed out in v1 > > > * Add T194 nvidia,instance property > > > --- > > > .../gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml | 109 ++++++++++++++++++ > > > MAINTAINERS | 1 + > > > 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 000000000000..571849625da8 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: "http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml#"; > > > +$schema: "http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#"; > > > + > > > +title: Device tree binding for NVIDIA Tegra NVDEC > > > + > > > +description: | > > > + NVDEC is the hardware video decoder present on NVIDIA Tegra210 > > > + and newer chips. It is located on the Host1x bus and typically > > > + programmed through Host1x channels. > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxx> > > > + - Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + $nodename: > > > + pattern: "^nvdec@[0-9a-f]*$" > > > + > > > + compatible: > > > + enum: > > > + - nvidia,tegra210-nvdec > > > + - nvidia,tegra186-nvdec > > > + - nvidia,tegra194-nvdec > > > + > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + clocks: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + clock-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: nvdec > > > + > > > + resets: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + reset-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: nvdec > > > + > > > + power-domains: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + iommus: > > > + maxItems: 1 > > > + > > > + interconnects: > > > + items: > > > + - description: DMA read memory client > > > + - description: DMA read 2 memory client > > > + - description: DMA write memory client > > > + > > > + interconnect-names: > > > + items: > > > + - const: dma-mem > > > + - const: read-1 > > > + - const: write > > > + > > > +required: > > > + - compatible > > > + - reg > > > + - clocks > > > + - clock-names > > > + - resets > > > + - reset-names > > > + - power-domains > > > + > > > +if: > > > + properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + contains: > > > + const: nvidia,tegra194-host1x > > > > host1x? This will never be true as the schema is only applied to nodes > > with the nvdec compatible. > > Argh, it's a typo indeed. Should be nvidia,tegra194-nvdec. > > > > > > +then: > > > + properties: > > > + nvidia,instance: > > > + items: > > > + - description: 0 for NVDEC0, or 1 for NVDEC1 > > > > What's this for? We generally don't do indices in DT. > > When programming the hardware through Host1x, we need to know the "class ID" > of the hardware, specific to each instance. So we need to know which > instance it is. Technically of course we could derive this from the MMIO > address but that seems more confusing. > > > > > > + > > > +additionalProperties: true > > > > This should be false or 'unevaluatedProperties: false' > > I tried that but it resulted in validation failures; please see the > discussion in v2. Rob mentioned that there is now support for unevaluatedProperties in dt-schema. I was able to test this, though with only limited success. I made the following changes on top of this patch: --- >8 --- diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml index d2681c98db7e..0bdf05fc8fc7 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml @@ -73,14 +73,18 @@ if: properties: compatible: contains: - const: nvidia,tegra194-host1x + const: nvidia,tegra194-nvdec then: properties: nvidia,instance: + $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32 items: - description: 0 for NVDEC0, or 1 for NVDEC1 -additionalProperties: true + required: + - nvidia,instance + +unevaluatedProperties: false examples: - | @@ -105,3 +109,28 @@ examples: interconnect-names = "dma-mem", "read-1", "write"; iommus = <&smmu TEGRA186_SID_NVDEC>; }; + + - | + #include <dt-bindings/clock/tegra194-clock.h> + #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h> + #include <dt-bindings/memory/tegra194-mc.h> + #include <dt-bindings/power/tegra194-powergate.h> + #include <dt-bindings/reset/tegra194-reset.h> + + nvdec@15480000 { + compatible = "nvidia,tegra194-nvdec"; + reg = <0x15480000 0x40000>; + clocks = <&bpmp TEGRA194_CLK_NVDEC>; + clock-names = "nvdec"; + resets = <&bpmp TEGRA194_RESET_NVDEC>; + reset-names = "nvdec"; + + nvidia,instance = <0>; + + power-domains = <&bpmp TEGRA194_POWER_DOMAIN_NVDECA>; + interconnects = <&mc TEGRA194_MEMORY_CLIENT_NVDECSRD &emc>, + <&mc TEGRA194_MEMORY_CLIENT_NVDECSRD1 &emc>, + <&mc TEGRA194_MEMORY_CLIENT_NVDECSWR &emc>; + interconnect-names = "dma-mem", "read-1", "write"; + iommus = <&smmu TEGRA194_SID_NVDEC>; + }; --- >8 --- As I said, this only works partially. One thing I have to do is comment out the whole "if:" block in meta-schemas/base.yaml in order to get rid of this error: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/host1x/nvidia,tegra210-nvdec.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property hint: A schema without a "$ref" to another schema must define all properties and use "additionalProperties" from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/base.yaml# which basically makes the whole file invalid. The reason seems to be that dt-schema will only allow unevaluatedProperties if there are any $ref references in the schema. Although I'm not sure I understand how exactly that works because I tried to inject a dummy $ref but that didn't fix the above error. Once that's worked around, though, I do get the examples to validate with just a small caveat: nvidia,instance is recognized as being required in the Tegra194 case (if I remove it from the example, I do get an error, as expected), but if I add nvidia,instance to the Tegra186 example, it doesn't actually produce an error and will just accept it as valid, even though the compatible is not nvidia,tegra194-nvdec. I don't have time at the moment to investigate why that is, but just thought I'd report this here in the meantime. Perhaps it's already a known issue? We could potentially side-step this by getting rid of the custom nvidia,instance property altogether. Unfortunately of_device_id table matching only supports matching by name, but not by unit-address, which would've been nice in this case. Matching by base address manually is a bit suboptimal, but it's not that bad. In any case, there are other examples I know of which need this type of functionality (a bunch of devices where the number and names of power supplies change from one generation to another), so this problem isn't going entirely away anyway. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
