On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 03:42:42PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 2:56 PM Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 07:26:22PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Hi ARM SoC maintainers, > > > > > > The following changes since commit a38fd8748464831584a19438cbb3082b5a2dab15: > > > > > > Linux 5.12-rc2 (2021-03-05 17:33:41 -0800) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/tegra-for-5.13-arm64-dt > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 405fa9e9d8664e830982c5fbcb70f9ba8656bafc: > > > > > > arm64: tegra: Move clocks from RT5658 endpoint to device node (2021-03-25 14:04:49 +0100) > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Thierry > > > > Hi Arnd, > > > > I noticed that v5.12-rc8 is still broken because of the missing > > fw_devlink=on patch from this PR. This PR was meant to go into v5.12, > > but it looks like you pulled it for the next release. > > Indeed, I never noticed the difference between the subject line and > the tag name. I usually go by the subject to see what branch to pick > and only then check if there are any discrepancies, but I missed this one. Oh yeah, that's even worse than I thought. I hadn't realized that my scripts had named the tag tegra-for-5.13-arm64-dt. Next time I'm going to take a closer look at the tag name and also send out fixes PRs separately from the feature PRs. > > In retrospect I realize that the way I sent this out was rather > > confusing. Any chance you can still pull these into v5.12 to unbreak > > the final release? > > I've pulled it into the arm/fixes branch now. There is only one other fix in > the arm/fixes, but I should still be able to send it out tomorrow. Excellent, thanks! Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
