26.03.2021 22:10, Mikko Perttunen пишет: > On 3/26/21 8:31 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> 26.03.2021 17:54, Mikko Perttunen пишет: >>> >>> Lockdep doesn't seem to be liking dev_name() for the name, and I think >>> allocating a string for this purpose seems a bit overkill, so I'll keep >>> the lock name as is if there are no objections. >> >> What does "liking" mean? >> > > kernel/locking/lockdep.c:894 (on my local tree): > > WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name && > lock->key != > &__lockdep_no_validate__); Alright, I see now that lockdep requires to use the same name.
