On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 11:50:13AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote: > On 3/10/21 10:52 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Build time dependencies aren't going to help anything, arm64 (and to my > > understanding some future x86 systems, LynxPoint IIRC) supports both DT > > and ACPI and so you have kernels built with support for both. > well, that's what I suggested initially: > if (is_of_node(card->dev->fwnode)) > I used the of_node test as a proxy for 'no DMI' since I am not aware of any > means to detect if DMI is enabled at run-time. Can we not fix the DMI code so it lets us check dmi_available either directly or with an accessor? I don't understand why all the proposals are dancing around local bodges here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
