On Tue, 16 Feb 2021 08:20:46 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:49:52 +0000 Lee Jones wrote: > > > Yes, please share. > > > > https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa > > Thanks for this. > > Oh, I see. So you conduct tests locally, then post them up in a > section called 'Checks' using the provided API. For some definition of "locally" - NIPA runs on a rented VM. > I assume that Patchwork does not alert the user when something has > gone awry? Is this something Nipa does? The way we run it on netdev is maintainer-centric, IOW we see the failures in patchwork and complain to people manually. The netdev mailing list gets too many messages as is, if NIPA responded with results automatically (which is not that hard technically) my concern is that people would be more likely to send untested patches to the mailing list and rely on the bot.
