25.01.2021 06:14, Viresh Kumar пишет: > On 22-01-21, 18:28, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: >> Either way will work, but maybe keeping the dev_pm_opp_set_bw() is a bit >> more straightforward variant for now since it will avoid the code's >> changes and it's probably a bit more obvious variant for the OPP users. > > The problem is it creates unnecessary paths which we need to support. For > example, in case of bandwidth itself we may want to update regulator/pm > domain/required OPPs and this should all be done for everyone. I really do not > want to keep separate paths for such stuff, it makes it hard to maintain.. > Maybe we could add dev_pm_opp_of_add_table_without_clock(), at least that should be a bit nicer from a drivers perspective than having to care about dev_pm_opp_clear_clk(), IMO.
