On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:08 AM Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 11/11/2020 02:11, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > The "fallthrough" pseudo-keyword was added as a portable way to denote > > intentional fallthrough. This code seemed to be using a mix of > > fallthrough comments that GCC recognizes, and some kind of lint marker. > > I'm guessing that linter hasn't been run in a while from the mixed use > > of the marker vs comments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > I know this is not the exact version that was merged, I can't find it on > the list, but looks like the version that was merged [0], It would be this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/20210115184826.2250-4-erik.kaneda@xxxxxxxxx/ Nick, Erik? > is causing build errors with older toolchains (GCC v6) ... > > /dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c: In function ‘acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op’: > /dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c:65:3: error: ‘ACPI_FALLTHROUGH’ undeclared (first use in this function) > ACPI_FALLTHROUGH; > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c:65:3: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in > /dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/scripts/Makefile.build:287: recipe for target 'drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.o' failed > > Cheers > Jon > > [0] https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/4b9135f5 > > -- > nvpublic
