11.01.2021 20:38, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>
> On 1/11/21 4:09 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 11.01.2021 14:50, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> 20.10.2020 19:37, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
>>>> On 10/20/20 12:48 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 09:03:54PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>>>>> VI I2C don't have DMA support and uses PIO mode all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Current driver uses writesl() to fill TX FIFO based on available
>>>>>> empty slots and with this seeing strange silent hang during any I2C
>>>>>> register access after filling TX FIFO with 8 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using writel() followed by i2c_readl() in a loop to write all words
>>>>>> to TX FIFO instead of using writesl() helps for large transfers in
>>>>>> PIO mode.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, this patch updates i2c_writesl() API to use writel() in a loop
>>>>>> instead of writesl().
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 9 ++++++---
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>> index 6f08c0c..274bf3a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
>>>>>> @@ -333,10 +333,13 @@ static u32 i2c_readl(struct tegra_i2c_dev
>>>>>> *i2c_dev, unsigned int reg)
>>>>>> return readl_relaxed(i2c_dev->base +
>>>>>> tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg));
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> -static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void
>>>>>> *data,
>>>>>> +static void i2c_writesl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 *data,
>>>>>> unsigned int reg, unsigned int len)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> - writesl(i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev, reg), data,
>>>>>> len);
>>>>>> + while (len--) {
>>>>>> + writel(*data++, i2c_dev->base + tegra_i2c_reg_addr(i2c_dev,
>>>>>> reg));
>>>>>> + i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS);
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> static void i2c_readsl(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, void
>>>>>> *data,
>>>>>> @@ -811,7 +814,7 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct
>>>>>> tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
>>>>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
>>>>>> i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf + words_to_transfer *
>>>>>> BYTES_PER_FIFO_WORD;
>>>>>> - i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>>>>> words_to_transfer);
>>>>>> + i2c_writesl(i2c_dev, (u32 *)buf, I2C_TX_FIFO,
>>>>>> words_to_transfer);
>>>>> I've thought a bit more about this and I wonder if we're simply
>>>>> reading
>>>>> out the wrong value for tx_fifo_avail and therefore end up overflowing
>>>>> the TX FIFO. Have you checked what the value is for tx_fifo_avail when
>>>>> this silent hang occurs? Given that this is specific to the VI I2C I'm
>>>>> wondering if this is perhaps a hardware bug where we read the wrong TX
>>>>> FIFO available count.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thierry
>>>> Yes FIFO status shows all 8 slots available.
>>> Please explain how you checked that 8 slots are available, provide
>>> example code.
>>>
>> Have you checked the FIFO overflow interrupt?
>
> This is seen with VI I2C (which is under host1x) as we use PIO mode
> always even for large transfers.
> HW wise VI I2C is similar to other I2C and FIFO depth is also 8 words.
>
> tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo() reads I2C_FIFO_STATUS register field
> TX_FIFO_EMPTY_CNT which tells empty slots available in TX_FIFO that can
> be filled.
> Added debug message to print empty count and, during beginning of
> transfer when it executes tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(), empty slots are 8
>
>
> Using writesl() for filling TX_FIFO causing silent hang immediate on any
> i2c register access after filling FIFO with 8 words and some times with
> 6 words as well.
>
> So couldn't INTERRUPT_STATUS registers to check for TX FIFO Overflows
> when this silent hang happens.
>
> Tried to read thru back-door (JTAG path) but could not connect to JTAG
> either. Looks like Tegra chip is in some weird state.
>
> But using writel() followed by i2c_readl helps. Not sure if any thing
> related to register access delay or some other issue.
>
>
Does downstream kernel have this problem?
If there is really no good alternative right now, then perhaps should be
a bit cleaner to add i2c_writesl_vi(), which should contain explanatory
comment telling why it's needed and then it should be used only for the
VI I2C controller.
