On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 09:05:52PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > Power domain fits much better than a voltage regulator in regards to > a proper hardware description and from a software perspective as well. > Hence replace the core regulator with the power domain. Note that this > doesn't affect any existing DTBs because we haven't started to use the > regulator yet, and thus, it's okay to change it. > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra30-emc.yaml | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra30-emc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra30-emc.yaml > index 0a2e2c0d0fdd..7b4af9169b0b 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra30-emc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/nvidia,tegra30-emc.yaml > @@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ properties: > description: > Phandle of the Memory Controller node. > > - core-supply: > + power-domains: > description: > - Phandle of voltage regulator of the SoC "core" power domain. > + Phandle to the SoC "core" power domain. power-domains needs to define how many (maxItems). > > operating-points-v2: > description: > @@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ examples: > > nvidia,memory-controller = <&mc>; > operating-points-v2 = <&dvfs_opp_table>; > - core-supply = <&vdd_core>; > + power-domains = <&domain>; > > #interconnect-cells = <0>; > > -- > 2.29.2 >
