On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 04:50:22PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 4:41 PM Alexandre Belloni > <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 01/12/2020 14:40:53+0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 07:50:25PM +0000, ZHIZHIKIN Andrey wrote: > > > > From Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > I tried to convince them before, it didn't work. I guess they don't like > > > to be spammed ;). > > > > The first rule of arm-soc is: you do not talk about arm@ and soc@ > > I don't mind having the addresses documented better, but it needs to > be done in a way that avoids having any patch for arch/arm*/boot/dts > and arch/arm/*/configs Cc:d to soc@xxxxxxxxxx. > > If anyone has suggestions for how to do that, let me know. Not a perfect solution but something. How about: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20201201211516.24921-2-krzk@xxxxxxxxxx/T/#u Would not work on defconfigs but there is a chance someone will find your addresses this way. Should not cause to much additional traffic. Best regards, Krzysztof
