On 16-11-20, 15:55, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Rafael, > > On 04/11/2020 09:33, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 03-11-20, 11:55, Jon Hunter wrote: > >> Commit b89c01c96051 ("cpufreq: tegra186: Fix initial frequency") > >> implemented the CPUFREQ 'get' callback to determine the current > >> operating frequency for each CPU. This implementation used a simple > >> looked up to determine the current operating frequency. The problem > >> with this is that frequency table for different Tegra186 devices may > >> vary and so the default boot frequency for Tegra186 device may or may > >> not be present in the frequency table. If the default boot frequency is > >> not present in the frequency table, this causes the function > >> tegra186_cpufreq_get() to return 0 and in turn causes cpufreq_online() > >> to fail which prevents CPUFREQ from working. > >> > >> Fix this by always calculating the CPU frequency based upon the current > >> 'ndiv' setting for the CPU. Note that the CPU frequency for Tegra186 is > >> calculated by reading the current 'ndiv' setting, multiplying by the > >> CPU reference clock and dividing by a constant divisor. > >> > >> Fixes: b89c01c96051 ("cpufreq: tegra186: Fix initial frequency") > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/cpufreq/tegra186-cpufreq.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++----------- > >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Rafael: This needs to go in the next rc and so I am not applying it > > in my tree as this is the only fix I have for now. > > > Are you able to pick this up for v5.10 fixes? Applied to my tree now, will send a PULL request soon. -- viresh