11.11.2020 09:18, Viresh Kumar пишет:
> On 11-11-20, 09:14, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 11.11.2020 08:53, Viresh Kumar пишет:
>>>> +static int tegra_emc_opp_table_init(struct tegra_emc *emc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct opp_table *reg_opp_table = NULL, *clk_opp_table, *hw_opp_table;
>>>> + u32 hw_version = BIT(tegra_sku_info.soc_speedo_id);
>>>> + const char *rname = "core";
>>>> + int err;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Legacy device-trees don't have OPP table and EMC driver isn't
>>>> + * useful in this case.
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (!device_property_present(emc->dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
>>> I don't understand why you want to check this ? The below call to
>>> dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() will fail anyway and that should be good for
>>> you.
>>>
>>
>> The dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() will produce a error message which doesn't
>> give a clue about what's wrong, i.e. that device-tree needs to be updated.
>
> If you think that you need to print something more, then you can do
> that in the error message you print when dev_pm_opp_of_add_table()
> fails. I would suggest to drop this redundant check here.
>
Please give the rationale.
