Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: tegra194: get consistent cpuinfo_cur_freq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Frequency returned by 'cpuinfo_cur_freq' using counters is not fixed
and keeps changing slightly. This change returns a consistent value
from freq_table. If the reconstructed frequency has acceptable delta
from the last written value, then return the frequency corresponding
to the last written ndiv value from freq_table. Otherwise, print a
warning and return the reconstructed freq.

Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
index e1d931c..d250e49 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c
@@ -180,9 +180,70 @@ static unsigned int tegra194_get_speed_common(u32 cpu, u32 delay)
       return (rate_mhz * KHZ); /* in KHz */
  }

+static void get_cpu_ndiv(void *ndiv)
+{
+     u64 ndiv_val;
+
+     asm volatile("mrs %0, s3_0_c15_c0_4" : "=r" (ndiv_val) : );
+
+     *(u64 *)ndiv = ndiv_val;
+}
+
+static void set_cpu_ndiv(void *data)

You weren't required to do this unnecessary change.

ya, moved the function up to keep both {get_|set_} calls together.

+{
+     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *tbl = data;
+     u64 ndiv_val = (u64)tbl->driver_data;
+
+     asm volatile("msr s3_0_c15_c0_4, %0" : : "r" (ndiv_val));
+}
+
  static unsigned int tegra194_get_speed(u32 cpu)
  {
-     return tegra194_get_speed_common(cpu, US_DELAY);
+     struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
+     struct cpufreq_frequency_table *pos;
+     unsigned int rate;
+     u64 ndiv;
+     int ret;
+     u32 cl;
+
+     if (!cpu_online(cpu))

This isn't required. The CPU is guaranteed to be online here.

OK, will remove this in next version.

+             return -EINVAL;
+
+     smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_cpu_cluster, &cl, true);
+
+     if (cl >= data->num_clusters)

Is it really possible here ? I meant you must have already checked
this at cpufreq-init level already. Else mark it unlikely at least.

Ya, will remove the check here.

+             return -EINVAL;
+
+     /* reconstruct actual cpu freq using counters */
+     rate = tegra194_get_speed_common(cpu, US_DELAY);
+
+     /* get last written ndiv value */
+     ret = smp_call_function_single(cpu, get_cpu_ndiv, &ndiv, true);
+     if (ret) {

What exactly can fail here ? get_cpu_ndiv() can't fail. Do we really
need this check ? What about WARN_ON_ONCE() ?

OK.

+             pr_err("cpufreq: Failed to get ndiv for CPU%d, ret:%d\n",
+                    cpu, ret);
+             return rate;
+     }
+
+     /*
+      * If the reconstructed frequency has acceptable delta from
+      * the last written value, then return freq corresponding
+      * to the last written ndiv value from freq_table. This is
+      * done to return consistent value.
+      */
+     cpufreq_for_each_valid_entry(pos, data->tables[cl]) {
+             if (pos->driver_data != ndiv)
+                     continue;
+
+             if (abs(pos->frequency - rate) > 115200) {

where does this 115200 comes from ? Strange that it matches tty's baud
rate :)
The value is equal to one freq step size.

This is 115 MHz, right ? Isn't that too big of a delta ?

The is the acceptable delta used during our testing keeping some margin.

+                     pr_warn("cpufreq: cpu%d,cur:%u,set:%u,set ndiv:%llu\n",
+                             cpu, rate, pos->frequency, ndiv);
+             } else {
+                     rate = pos->frequency;
+             }
+             break;
+     }
+     return rate;
  }

--
viresh




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux