27.09.2020 00:24, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> 26.09.2020 11:07, Nicolin Chen пишет:
> ...
>> + for (pd_index = 0; pd_index < SMMU_NUM_PDE; pd_index++) {
>> + struct page *pt;
>> + u32 *addr;
>> +
>> + if (!as->count[pd_index] || !pd[pd_index])
>> + continue;
>
> I guess the idea of this patch is to print out the hardware state, isn't
> it? Hence the as->count shouldn't be checked here.
Perhaps also will be good to check whether the state of
!as->count[pd_index] matches state of !pd[pd_index].
WARN_ON_ONCE(!as->count[pd_index] ^ !pd[pd_index])
