Quoting Thierry Reding (2020-09-22 00:39:39) > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:00:58PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Thierry Reding (2020-09-21 05:18:42) > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 02:16:28PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > > Hi Mike, Stephen, > > > > > > > > The following changes since commit 9123e3a74ec7b934a4a099e98af6a61c2f80bbf5: > > > > > > > > Linux 5.9-rc1 (2020-08-16 13:04:57 -0700) > > > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tegra/linux.git tags/for-5.10-clk > > > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to 2f878d04218c8b26f6d0ab26955ca6b03848a1ad: > > > > > > > > clk: tegra: Fix missing prototype for tegra210_clk_register_emc() (2020-09-21 14:09:10 +0200) > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Thierry > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > clk: tegra: Changes for v5.10-rc1 > > > > > > > > This is a set of small fixes for the Tegra clock driver. > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thierry Reding (3): > > > > clk: tegra: Capitalization fixes > > > > clk: tegra: Always program PLL_E when enabled > > > > clk: tegra: Fix missing prototype for tegra210_clk_register_emc() > > > > > > > > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-pll.c | 7 ++----- > > > > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210-emc.c | 2 ++ > > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > > > I just realized after sending this out that this is all really tiny and > > > minor fixes, so perhaps it makes sense to even apply this for v5.9? > > > > > > > Is something critical? If so then it's OK to merge for v5.9, otherwise > > I'd rather let it cook in -next for a while. Being small doesn't really > > make a difference here. What matters is that it fixes some critical > > problem, preferably introduced this merge window but if it's annoying > > enough that rule can be broken. > > This is actually a subset of a set of patches that I had sitting on a > for-5.9/clk branch but for which I forgot to send a pull request. This > was pointed out to me on IRC yesterday. So this should already be soft- > boiled. > > The first patch is just a tiny bit of cleanup, but the second patch > fixes a real problem with SATA that can happen depending on how the > bootloader has set up the PLL_E. The third patch fixes a build > warning, which admittedly isn't critical, but certainly nice to have. > Given that the latter two are the only known issues with the clock > driver I think it would be nice to have them in v5.9, especially since > that's going to be an LTS and we'll end up back-porting at least two of > these patches to it anyway. > Ok. Is the bootloader problem happening right now?
