The "num_tlb_lines" might not be a power-of-2 value, being 48 on Tegra210 for example. So the current way of calculating tlb_mask using the num_tlb_lines is not correct: tlb_mask=0x5f in case of num_tlb_lines=48, which will trim a setting of 0x30 (48) to 0x10. Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c index 84fdee473873..0becdbfea306 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c +++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c @@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev, BIT_MASK(mc->soc->num_address_bits - SMMU_PTE_SHIFT) - 1; dev_dbg(dev, "address bits: %u, PFN mask: %#lx\n", mc->soc->num_address_bits, smmu->pfn_mask); - smmu->tlb_mask = (smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines << 1) - 1; + smmu->tlb_mask = (1 << fls(smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines)) - 1; dev_dbg(dev, "TLB lines: %u, mask: %#lx\n", smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines, smmu->tlb_mask); -- 2.17.1
