[RESEND][PATCH 1/2] iommu/tegra-smmu: Fix tlb_mask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The "num_tlb_lines" might not be a power-of-2 value, being 48 on
Tegra210 for example. So the current way of calculating tlb_mask
using the num_tlb_lines is not correct: tlb_mask=0x5f in case of
num_tlb_lines=48, which will trim a setting of 0x30 (48) to 0x10.

Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
index 84fdee473873..0becdbfea306 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/tegra-smmu.c
@@ -1120,7 +1120,7 @@ struct tegra_smmu *tegra_smmu_probe(struct device *dev,
 		BIT_MASK(mc->soc->num_address_bits - SMMU_PTE_SHIFT) - 1;
 	dev_dbg(dev, "address bits: %u, PFN mask: %#lx\n",
 		mc->soc->num_address_bits, smmu->pfn_mask);
-	smmu->tlb_mask = (smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines << 1) - 1;
+	smmu->tlb_mask = (1 << fls(smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines)) - 1;
 	dev_dbg(dev, "TLB lines: %u, mask: %#lx\n", smmu->soc->num_tlb_lines,
 		smmu->tlb_mask);
 
-- 
2.17.1




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux