On 26-06-20, 21:13, Sumit Gupta wrote:
+static int tegra194_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct tegra194_cpufreq_data *data;
+ struct tegra_bpmp *bpmp;
+ int err, i;
+
+ data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ data->num_clusters = MAX_CLUSTERS;
+ data->tables = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev, data->num_clusters,
+ sizeof(*data->tables), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!data->tables)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, data);
+
+ bpmp = tegra_bpmp_get(&pdev->dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(bpmp))
+ return PTR_ERR(bpmp);
+
+ read_counters_wq = alloc_workqueue("read_counters_wq", __WQ_LEGACY, 1);
+ if (!read_counters_wq) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "fail to create_workqueue\n");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto put_bpmp;
This will call destroy_workqueue() eventually and it will crash your
kernel.
Apart from this, this stuff looks okay. Don't resend the patch just
yet (and if required, send only this patch using --in-reply-to flag
for git send email). Lets wait for an Ack from Rob for the first two
patches.
Sorry for the delayed response as i was on PTO.
Thank you for the feedback.
Have posted a v5 based on v4 patch set.
+ }
+
--
viresh
