On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:19 PM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 08.07.2020 11:46, Andy Shevchenko пишет:
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 11:29 AM Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Check whether GPIO IRQ is enabled before proceeding with handling the
> >> interrupt request. The interrupt handler now returns IRQ_NONE if none
> >> of interrupts were handled, which is usually a sign of a problem.
> >
> > ...
> >
> >> - pending = value;
> >> + pending = value & gpio->irq_enb_mask;
> >
> >> + if (!pending)
> >> + return IRQ_NONE;
> >
> > for_each_set_bit() should take care of it, no?
>
> Do you mean that the handle_nested_irq() takes care of handling
> unrequested interrupts? Actually, looks like it cares. Alright, I'll
> drop this patch since it should be unnecessary. Thank you for the comment!
I think it's still good to have reduced IRQs to handle by dropping not
enabled ones, my comment was about the case when pending == 0. Sorry
if it was unclear.
> > (and probably return with IRQ_RETVAL() macro)
> >
> >> for_each_set_bit(offset, &pending, MAX77620_GPIO_NR) {
> >> unsigned int virq;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
