Thank you for your advice. I think tegra194 is a good choice and I will use it in the next edition of patch. "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>写道： > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 11:59:08AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0800, Dinghao Liu wrote: > > > pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even > > > it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on > > > > s/even it/even when it/ > > > > Might also be a good idea to use a different subject prefix because I > > was almost not going to look at the other patch, taking this to be a > > replacement for it. > > Amen. This would be a good change to start using "PCI: tegra194" or > something for pcie-tegra194.c. Or will there be tegra195, tegra 196, > etc added to this driver? > > Also, please capitalize the first word and "PM" in the subjects: > > PCI: tegra194: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error > > Bjorn
