On 30/04/2020 09:07:01-0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 07:08:23PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The RTC present on MAX77620 can be used to generate an alarm at a given
> > time, which in turn can be used as a wakeup source for the system if it
> > is properly wired up.
> >
> > Document how to enable the RTC to act as a wakeup source.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77620.txt | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77620.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77620.txt
> > index 5a642a51d58e..f05005b0993e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77620.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/max77620.txt
> > @@ -125,6 +125,17 @@ MAX77663 supports 20, 40, 80, 160, 320, 640, 1280 and 2540 microseconds.
> > control) then, GPIO1/nRST_IO goes LOW.
> > this property is valid for max20024 only.
> >
> > +Realtime Clock
> > +--------------
> > +The MAX77620 family of power management ICs contain a realtime clock block
> > +that can be used to keep track of time even when the system is powered off.
> > +
> > +The realtime clock can also be programmed to trigger alerts, which can be
> > +used to wake the system up from sleep. In order to configure the RTC to act
> > +as a wakeup source, add an "rtc" child node and add the "wakeup-source"
> > +property.
> > +
> > +
> > For DT binding details of different sub modules like GPIO, pincontrol,
> > regulator, power, please refer respective device-tree binding document
> > under their respective sub-system directories.
> > @@ -159,4 +170,8 @@ max77620@3c {
> > maxim,fps-event-source = <MAX77620_FPS_EVENT_SRC_SW>;
> > };
> > };
> > +
> > + rtc {
> > + wakeup-source;
>
> Is the RTC really the only thing that could wake the system in this
> PMIC?
>
> I don't think it's really valid to have 'wakeup-source' without
> 'interrupts' unless the wakeup mechanism is somehow not an interrupt. So
> I think this belongs in the parent node.
>
I don't think this is true because in the case of a discrete RTC, its
interrupt pin can be connected directly to a PMIC to power up a board
instead of being connected to the SoC. In that case we don't have an
interrupt property but the RTC is still a wakeup source. This is the
usual use case for wakeup-source in the RTC subsystem. Else, if there is
an interrupt, then we assume the RTC is a wakeup source and there is no
need to have the wakeup-source property.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
