17.04.2020 22:24, Laurent Pinchart пишет: ... > As I tried to explain before, if you wrap the panel in a bridge with > drm_panel_bridge_add() (or the devm_ variant), you will always have a > bridge associated with the output, and will be able to remove your > custom connector implementation. I thus recommend converting to > drm_panel_bridge_add() either as part of this patch series, or just > after it, to get full benefits. > > With the assumption that this will be handled, > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Thanks you very much! Yes, I got yours point about wrapping panel into the bridge. But I don't think that it's worth the effort right now because each Tegra output has it's own implantation of the connector and it should be cleaner not to touch that code. Secondly, I don't have hardware to test all available panel output types on Tegra and the benefits of messing with all that code are a bit dim to me. I can make a patch to wrap the RGB panel into a bridge, but this should make code a bit inconsistent in regards to not having a common code path for the "legacy" nvidia,panel. So perhaps it's better to leave it all as-is for now.
