Hi Dmitry, On 3/31/20 8:16 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > MCCPU frequency boosting needs to be taken into account in order to avoid > scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates. "in order to avoid scheduling of unnecessary devfreq updates." I don't understand the correct meaning of following description. Could you explain it more detailed? > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > index 34f6291e880c..3b57aac9894c 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra30-devfreq.c > @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ tegra_actmon_cpufreq_contribution(struct tegra_devfreq *tegra, > > static_cpu_emc_freq = actmon_cpu_to_emc_rate(tegra, cpu_freq); > > - if (dev_freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq) > + if (dev_freq + actmon_dev->boost_freq >= static_cpu_emc_freq) > return 0; > > return static_cpu_emc_freq; > -- Best Regards, Chanwoo Choi Samsung Electronics
