Hi Wei,
On 19/02/2019 03:15, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> +static int tegra_thermctl_get_trend(void *data, int trip, +
>>> enum thermal_trend *trend)
[ ... ]
>>> + temp = tz->temperature; + last_temp = tz->last_temperature; +
>>> mutex_unlock(&tz->lock); + + if (temp > trip_temp) { + if
>>> (temp >= last_temp) + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_RAISING; +
>>> else + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE; + } else if (temp <
>>> trip_temp) { + *trend = THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING; + } else { +
>>> *trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE; + } + + return 0; +} + static
>>> const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tegra_of_thermal_ops =
>>> { .get_temp = tegra_thermctl_get_temp, .set_trip_temp =
>>> tegra_thermctl_set_trip_temp, + .get_trend =
>>> tegra_thermctl_get_trend, };
It has been awhile since this patch was submitted and merged by
Eduardo. I replace him to co-maintain the thermal framework with Rui.
While figuring out the internals for code cleanup, I ended up in this
function above.
Why do you have to use this routine instead of the generic one in
get_tz_trend()?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
