19.02.2020 17:38, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 19/02/2020 12:25, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 17.02.2020 10:37, Jiri Slaby пишет:
>>> On 09. 02. 20, 17:44, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> It is possible to get an instant RX timeout or end-of-transfer interrupt
>>>> before RX DMA was started, if transaction is less than 16 bytes. Transfer
>>>> should be handled in PIO mode in this case because DMA can't handle it.
>>>> This patch brings back the original behaviour of the driver that was
>>>> changed by accident by a previous commit, it fixes occasional Bluetooth HW
>>>> initialization failures which I started to notice recently.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d5e3fadb7012 ("tty: serial: tegra: Activate RX DMA transfer by request")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Changelog:
>>>>
>>>> v2: - Corrected commit's title by adding the accidentally missed "tegra: "
>>>> to the prefix.
>>>>
>>>> drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c | 35 ++++++++++++++-----------------
>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
>>>> index 33034b852a51..8de8bac9c6c7 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial-tegra.c
>>>> @@ -692,11 +692,22 @@ static void tegra_uart_copy_rx_to_tty(struct tegra_uart_port *tup,
>>>> count, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void do_handle_rx_pio(struct tegra_uart_port *tup)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(&tup->uport.state->port);
>>>> + struct tty_port *port = &tup->uport.state->port;
>>>> +
>>>> + tegra_uart_handle_rx_pio(tup, port);
>>>> + if (tty) {
>>>
>>> What's the tty good for here, actually?
>>>
>>>> + tty_flip_buffer_push(port);
>>>> + tty_kref_put(tty);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>
>> I'm not really a TTY expert..
>>
>> Jon, maybe you have any clue whether TTY could disappear while port is
>> opened?
>
> Nothing specific that I am aware of. The function tty_kref_get() appears
> to check that the tty pointer is valid and so it would seem logical to
> check here as well. But happy to be corrected :-)
Okay, thanks.
