On 2/6/2020 11:40 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 04:03:34PM +0530, Sameer Pujar wrote:
Audio Hub (AHUB) comprises a collection of hardware accelerators for audio
pre-processing and post-processing and a programmable full crossbar for
audio routing across these accelerators. This patch adds YAML schema for DT
binding of AHUB and few of its following components. These devices will be
registered as ASoC components.
* ADMAIF
* I2S
* DMIC
* DSPK
Signed-off-by: Sameer Pujar <spujar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml | 105 +++++++++++++
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-admaif.yaml | 165 +++++++++++++++++++++
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ahub.yaml | 130 ++++++++++++++++
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-dmic.yaml | 105 +++++++++++++
.../bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-i2s.yaml | 112 ++++++++++++++
5 files changed, 617 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-admaif.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ahub.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-dmic.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-i2s.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dc9fef3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra186-dspk.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0)
. . .
+ items:
+ - description: initial module clock rate
+
+ "#sound-dai-cells":
+ const: 1
+
+ sound-name-prefix:
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string
+ description:
+ Used as prefix for sink/source names of the component. Must be a
+ unique string among multiple instances of the same component.
+ The name can be "DSPK1" or "DSPKx", where x depends on the maximum
Sounds like a constraint.
Is there a better way to convey the recommended strings above?
All the other comments I will fix in next revision. Thanks.
. . .
