On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 04:56:41PM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote: > Yes that is going to be a problem. I assume that your codec wants a > 256*fs MCLK? Maybe in that case you are better off having the codec > drive the bit clock and fsync? > Is 24-bit critical to what you are doing? > Otherwise maybe we should drop the 24-bit support for now and just keep > 32-bit. Removing the support because one particular board has limited clocks isn't good - it'd be better to have components with clocking restrictions impose constraints as needed.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature