On 15/01/2020 09:18, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2020 21:02, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 14.01.2020 18:15, Jon Hunter пишет:
>>>
>>> On 12/01/2020 17:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>>> The ISR tasklet could be kept scheduled after DMA transfer termination,
>>>> let's add synchronization callback which blocks until tasklet is finished.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c | 8 ++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>>> index 319f31d27014..664e9c5df3ba 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra20-apb-dma.c
>>>> @@ -798,6 +798,13 @@ static int tegra_dma_terminate_all(struct dma_chan *dc)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static void tegra_dma_synchronize(struct dma_chan *dc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct tegra_dma_channel *tdc = to_tegra_dma_chan(dc);
>>>> +
>>>> + tasklet_kill(&tdc->tasklet);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Wouldn't there need to be some clean-up here? If the tasklet is
>>> scheduled, seems that there would be some other house-keeping that needs
>>> to be done after killing it.
>>
>> I'm not seeing anything to clean-up, could you please clarify?
>
> Clean-up with regard to the descriptors. I was concerned if you will the
> tasklet the necessary clean-up of the descriptors is not handled.
Ah I see that tasklet_kill, unlike tasklet_kill_immediate, does wait for
the tasklet to run if scheduled. OK, then this should be fine.
Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers
Jon
--
nvpublic
