Re: [PATCH v4 06/19] soc: tegra: Add Tegra PMC clock registrations into PMC driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 12/19/19 8:34 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
20.12.2019 07:13, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
On 12/19/19 5:39 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
20.12.2019 04:21, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
On 12/18/19 4:41 PM, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
On 12/18/19 1:44 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
18.12.2019 11:35, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
18.12.2019 11:30, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
17.12.2019 23:03, Sowjanya Komatineni пишет:
Tegra PMC has clk_out_1, clk_out_2, and clk_out_3 clocks and
currently
these PMC clocks are registered by Tegra clock driver with each
clock as
separate mux and gate clocks using clk_register_mux and
clk_register_gate
by passing PMC base address and register offsets and PMC
programming for
these clocks happens through direct PMC access by the clock driver.

With this, when PMC is in secure mode any direct PMC access from
the
non-secure world does not go through and these clocks will not be
functional.

This patch adds these PMC clocks registration to pmc driver with
PMC as
a clock provider and registers each clock as single clock.

clk_ops callback implementations for these clocks uses
tegra_pmc_readl and
tegra_pmc_writel which supports PMC programming in both secure
mode and
non-secure mode.

Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
    drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c | 248
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    1 file changed, 248 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
index ea0e11a09c12..6d65194a6e71 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/pmc.c
@@ -13,6 +13,9 @@
      #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
    #include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+#include <linux/clkdev.h>
+#include <linux/clk/clk-conf.h>
    #include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
    #include <linux/debugfs.h>
    #include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -48,6 +51,7 @@
    #include <dt-bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-io-pad.h>
    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra186-gpio.h>
    #include <dt-bindings/gpio/tegra194-gpio.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/soc/tegra-pmc.h>
      #define PMC_CNTRL            0x0
    #define  PMC_CNTRL_INTR_POLARITY    BIT(17) /* inverts INTR
polarity */
@@ -100,6 +104,7 @@
    #define PMC_WAKE2_STATUS        0x168
    #define PMC_SW_WAKE2_STATUS        0x16c
    +#define PMC_CLK_OUT_CNTRL        0x1a8
    #define PMC_SENSOR_CTRL            0x1b0
    #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_SCRATCH_WRITE    BIT(2)
    #define  PMC_SENSOR_CTRL_ENABLE_RST    BIT(1)
@@ -155,6 +160,64 @@
    #define  TEGRA_SMC_PMC_READ    0xaa
    #define  TEGRA_SMC_PMC_WRITE    0xbb
    +struct pmc_clk {
+    struct clk_hw    hw;
+    unsigned long    offs;
+    u32        mux_mask;
+    u32        mux_shift;
+    u32        gate_shift;
+};
+
+#define to_pmc_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct pmc_clk, hw)
+
+struct pmc_clk_init_data {
+    char *name;
+    const char *const *parents;
+    int num_parents;
+    int clk_id;
+    u8 mux_shift;
+    u8 gate_shift;
+};
+
+static const char * const clk_out1_parents[] = { "osc",
"osc_div2",
+    "osc_div4", "extern1",
+};
+
+static const char * const clk_out2_parents[] = { "osc",
"osc_div2",
+    "osc_div4", "extern2",
+};
+
+static const char * const clk_out3_parents[] = { "osc",
"osc_div2",
+    "osc_div4", "extern3",
+};
+
+static const struct pmc_clk_init_data tegra_pmc_clks_data[] = {
+    {
+        .name = "clk_out_1",
+        .parents = clk_out1_parents,
+        .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out1_parents),
+        .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_1,
+        .mux_shift = 6,
+        .gate_shift = 2,
I'd replace these with a single .shift, given that mux_shift =
gate_shift + 4 for all clocks.

+    },
+    {
+        .name = "clk_out_2",
+        .parents = clk_out2_parents,
+        .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out2_parents),
+        .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_2,
+        .mux_shift = 14,
+        .gate_shift = 10,
+    },
+    {
+        .name = "clk_out_3",
+        .parents = clk_out3_parents,
+        .num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(clk_out3_parents),
+        .clk_id = TEGRA_PMC_CLK_OUT_3,
+        .mux_shift = 22,
+        .gate_shift = 18,
+    },
+};
+
    struct tegra_powergate {
        struct generic_pm_domain genpd;
        struct tegra_pmc *pmc;
@@ -254,6 +317,9 @@ struct tegra_pmc_soc {
         */
        const struct tegra_wake_event *wake_events;
        unsigned int num_wake_events;
+
+    const struct pmc_clk_init_data *pmc_clks_data;
+    unsigned int num_pmc_clks;
    };
      static const char * const tegra186_reset_sources[] = {
@@ -2163,6 +2229,173 @@ static int tegra_pmc_clk_notify_cb(struct
notifier_block *nb,
        return NOTIFY_OK;
    }
    +static void pmc_clk_fence_udelay(u32 offset)
+{
+    tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offset);
+    /* pmc clk propagation delay 2 us */
+    udelay(2);
+}
+
+static u8 pmc_clk_mux_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+    struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
+    u32 val;
+
+    val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs) >> clk->mux_shift;
+    val &= clk->mux_mask;
+
+    return val;
+}
+
+static int pmc_clk_mux_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
+{
+    struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
+    u32 val;
+
+    val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs);
+    val &= ~(clk->mux_mask << clk->mux_shift);
+    val |= index << clk->mux_shift;
+    tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, val, clk->offs);
+    pmc_clk_fence_udelay(clk->offs);
Is this fencing applies only to clock changes or maybe it won't hurt to
move it into tegra_pmc_writel()?
Only for clock changes

+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int pmc_clk_is_enabled(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+    struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
+
+    return tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, clk->offs) & BIT(clk->gate_shift)
? 1 : 0;
+}
+
+static void pmc_clk_set_state(unsigned long offs, u32 shift, int
state)
+{
+    u32 val;
+
+    val = tegra_pmc_readl(pmc, offs);
+    val = state ? (val | BIT(shift)) : (val & ~BIT(shift));
+    tegra_pmc_writel(pmc, val, offs);
+    pmc_clk_fence_udelay(offs);
+}
+
+static int pmc_clk_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+    struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
+
+    pmc_clk_set_state(clk->offs, clk->gate_shift, 1);
+
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static void pmc_clk_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
+{
+    struct pmc_clk *clk = to_pmc_clk(hw);
+
+    pmc_clk_set_state(clk->offs, clk->gate_shift, 0);
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops pmc_clk_ops = {
+    .get_parent = pmc_clk_mux_get_parent,
+    .set_parent = pmc_clk_mux_set_parent,
+    .determine_rate = __clk_mux_determine_rate,
+    .is_enabled = pmc_clk_is_enabled,
+    .enable = pmc_clk_enable,
+    .disable = pmc_clk_disable,
+};
+
+static struct clk *
+tegra_pmc_clk_out_register(const struct pmc_clk_init_data *data,
+               unsigned long offset)
+{
+    struct clk_init_data init;
+    struct pmc_clk *pmc_clk;
+
+    pmc_clk = kzalloc(sizeof(*pmc_clk), GFP_KERNEL);
+    if (!pmc_clk)
+        return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+
+    init.name = data->name;
+    init.ops = &pmc_clk_ops;
+    init.parent_names = data->parents;
+    init.num_parents = data->num_parents;
+    init.flags = CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT |
+             CLK_SET_PARENT_GATE;
+
+    pmc_clk->hw.init = &init;
+    pmc_clk->offs = offset;
+    pmc_clk->mux_mask = 3;
If mux_mask is a constant value, perhaps will be better to
replace the
variable with a literal?

#define PMC_CLK_OUT_MUX_MASK    GENMASK(1, 0)
Maybe even:

#define PMC_CLK_OUT_MUX_MASK(c)    GENMASK(c->shift + 1, c->shift)
MUX Mask is used only here for PMC clock out and is same for all
clk_out mux so will use

#define PMC_CLK_OUT_MUX_MASK    GENMASK(1, 0)

I want to point out that may be a separated gate/mux shifts is a fine
variant, you should try and see whether another variants produce more
concise result.

[snip]
We can do mux_shift as gate_shift + 4 and that restricts this clk
register only for clk1/2/3 as well and there are no other clocks in pmc
anyway.

How about using bit shift define for CLK1, CLK2, and CLK3?

.mux_shift = PMC_CLK1_SRC_SEL_SHIFT,

.gate_shift = PMC_CLK1_FORCE_EN_SHIFT,


I think that just renaming ".gate_shift" -> ".force_en_shift" should be
good enough.
You meant to assign bit position directly instead of defines like what I
have now in v4 and use force_en_shift instead of gate_shift?
Yes




[Index of Archives]     [ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux