On 13/11/2019 at 10:42, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> dma_request_slave_channel_reason() is:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> dma_request_chan(dev, name)
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx>
I'm not sure we need one patch per driver. If series taken:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> index 9e84a93083bc..56f0ca361deb 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_configure_dma(struct spi_master *master,
> dma_cap_zero(mask);
> dma_cap_set(DMA_SLAVE, mask);
>
> - master->dma_tx = dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, "tx");
> + master->dma_tx = dma_request_chan(dev, "tx");
> if (IS_ERR(master->dma_tx)) {
> err = PTR_ERR(master->dma_tx);
> if (err == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
